Time left for objections to 2nd
Scaffold Hill Planning Application

 
Days
 
Hours
 
Minutes
 
Seconds
HOW TO OBJECT to Application
 

Travellers Site "Search Area"

So far no planning applications have been made for a travellers site. North Tyneside Council have established a need for a travellers site from the 2009 GTAA. NTC have obtained the funding and now want to build it in a preferred "search area". The preferred search area will remain part of NTC's core strategy until 2027, therefore, this site and any additional future travellers site will be established within the same "Search Area".

The Council's core strategy will be used to guide future planning decisions. Any proposed travellers site falling within the preferred "search area" will be preferred for planning approval. By the same token, planning applications for traveller sites outside the "preferred area" will likely be refused as not in accordance with the "core strategy" (traveller site development elsewhere in North Tyneside has already been rejected as part of the core strategy consultation).

Travellers site search area There are many locations across North Tyneside capable of accommodating a travellers site but oddly not included in the preferred options "search area". This is puzzling and can only lead to two possibilities; either North Tyneside Council have an uncanny gift of knowing the best places to "search" this being the A19 corridor and a small part of Sandy Lane, or North Tyneside Council have an eye on suitable sites already. you can spend ten minutes on google maps searching the entire A19 corridor for suitable sites - Clearly this is not really a "search area" but a preferred area.

If the preferred travellers site "Search Area" remains in the North Tyneside core strategy it will remain there for the next 17 years. This will inevitably lead to uncertainty, not just of the location of the existing requirement 9 pitch site, but also any future expansions needs.

The planning criteria for selection of a suitable travellers site is set out in the core strategy (10.2 preferred housing sites) option 17, these criteria would apply to the acceptance of any suitable site within North Tyneside, i.e. Normal planning considerations apply to the whole of North Tyneside. Peculiarly option 18a (Table 16) rejects options 17, however, option 18b (the "preferred option") is to seek a site on the A19 or Sandy Lane using the criteria set down in the rejected option 17. The reason the council give for this decision is twofold, 1) Gypsies favour places they've had unauthorised camps in the past and 2) the "potential location would in terms of good accessibility and ease of movement from one area to another, assist a transient lifestyle." (read: Gypsies like roads because they travel on them).

Option 18 should not be in the plan at all, Option 17 is the preferred option but paradoxically made impotent by option 18a's rejection of it. The reasons given for option 18b as preferred over 18a (restriction to Sandy Lane/A19) are illogical there is no direct correlation with preferred Gypsy site locations and the locations of previous unauthorised camps. Unauthorised camps could be the first location the gypsies found suitable to camp or even the only place - suitability does not equate to preference. With regards to the 2nd reason (simplified 'gypsies like roads'), a car and caravan can easily access any part of North Tyneside.

North Tyneside Council have already rejected looking elsewhere for a Travellers site, the reasons North Tyneside Council has given for doing this are artificial and clearly intended to keep any travellers sites away from Killingworth or other "choice" areas of North Tyneside. If North Tyneside Council establish area's of search these should be properly defined based on identified location requirements either from the GTAA or national guidelines.

North Tyneside Council has a legal obligation to provide an official travellers site, it should not restrict its consideration to a limited and arbitrary "Search Area", particularly a search area comprised almost entirely of unwanted or undevelopable land. North Tyneside Council should apply the guidance in ODPM Circular 01/2006 to it's selection of search areas and follow a more sensible search area selection criteria, similar to that followed by other Council's (such as Wiltshire Council, whose search criteria is more comprehensive and truly reflective of traveller's needs.

There is no reason for North Tyneside Council to restrict the "area of search" to Sandy Lane (adjacent the proposed executive housing development at site 69) and the A19 corridor. The council should consider any potential travel sites on planning merits detailed in option 17 alone (option 18a).

 

The only action necessary for these Planning Applications and the core strategy to happen, is no action at all...



View the Holystone Action Group
Core Strategy Objections document (PDF), this document was compiled from residents responses and submitted as part of the CSPO consultation.

If you want to support the Holystone Action Group's campaign against the North Tyneside Council core strategy preferred options or you need more information, please contact hagsaysno@gmail.com




 

Core Strategy

Plans in Progress

Housing Sites

Travellers Site

Downloads and Templates

Contacts